Simon and Schuster, 270 pp., $24.00
Oxford University Press, 270 pp., $28.00
United Nations, 2004, 129 pp. (available at www.un.org/secureworld)
Report on the United States
May 2005, 164 pp. (available at www.amnesty.org)
Those of us who opposed America's invasion of Iraq from the outset can take no comfort from its catastrophic consequences. On the contrary: we should now be asking ourselves some decidedly uncomfortable questions. The first concerns the propriety of 'preventive' military intervention. If the Iraq war is wrong—'the wrong war at the wrong time'[1]—why, then, was the 1999 US-led war on Serbia right? That war, after all, also lacked the imprimatur of UN Security Council approval. It too was an unauthorized and uninvited attack on a sovereign state—undertaken on 'preventive' grounds—that caused many civilian casualties and aroused bitter resentment against the Americans who carried it out.
Review, 5263 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |